粒径计算方法对细观混凝土数值建模的影响
CSTR:
作者:
作者单位:

中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083

作者简介:

朱天宇(1993—),男,河南信阳人,中国矿业大学(北京)博士生.E-mail:ztyiyou@163.com

通讯作者:

陈忠辉(1968—),男,江苏南通人,中国矿业大学(北京)教授,博士生导师,博士.E-mail:cumtbczh@163.com

中图分类号:

TU528.01

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52074292);“十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1503103)


Influence of Particle Size Calculation Method on Numerical Modeling of Meso-concrete
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing),Beijing 100083,China

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用最小包围盒(MBB)法确定骨料粒径,并与采用等体积球(EVS)法计算的骨料粒径进行比较,分析了这2种粒径计算方法对细观混凝土内部结构的影响.结果表明:采用MBB法计算的骨料粒径与室内试验采用筛分法确定的骨料粒径更为接近;与MBB法相比,EVS法低估了球状、片状和盘状骨料的粒径,且被低估的骨料占比由大到小依次为球状、片状和盘状,EVS法高估了棒状骨料的粒径;粒径计算方法对细观混凝土内部结构的影响因骨料形状类型不同而呈现一定差异性.

    Abstract:

    Aggregate particle size was measured by the minimum bounding box (MBB) method and compared with that calculated by the equal volume sphere (EVS) method. The results of these two methods on the internal structure of meso-concrete were analyzed. The results show that the aggregate particle size calculated by MBB method is close to that measured by sieving method in the laboratory test. Compared with the MBB method, the EVS method tends to underestimate the particle sizes of spherical, blade and disc types of aggregates, and the percentage of underestimated aggregates is in descending order as spherical, blade and disc types while that of the particles of rode type was overestimated. The influence of the particle size calculation method on the internal structure of meso- concrete shows some differences with respect to the type of aggregate shape.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱天宇,陈忠辉,张令非,年庚乾.粒径计算方法对细观混凝土数值建模的影响[J].建筑材料学报,2024,27(2):106-113

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-13
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-01
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-29
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码