粒径计算方法对细观混凝土数值建模的影响
作者:
作者单位:

中国矿业大学(北京) 力学与建筑工程学院,北京 100083

作者简介:

朱天宇(1993—),男,河南信阳人,中国矿业大学(北京)博士生.E-mail:ztyiyou@163.com

通讯作者:

陈忠辉(1968—),男,江苏南通人,中国矿业大学(北京)教授,博士生导师,博士.E-mail:cumtbczh@163.com

中图分类号:

TU528.01

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(52074292);“十三五”国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFC1503103)


Influence of Particle Size Calculation Method on Numerical Modeling of Meso-concrete
Author:
Affiliation:

School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering,China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing),Beijing 100083,China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    采用最小包围盒(MBB)法确定骨料粒径,并与采用等体积球(EVS)法计算的骨料粒径进行比较,分析了这2种粒径计算方法对细观混凝土内部结构的影响.结果表明:采用MBB法计算的骨料粒径与室内试验采用筛分法确定的骨料粒径更为接近;与MBB法相比,EVS法低估了球状、片状和盘状骨料的粒径,且被低估的骨料占比由大到小依次为球状、片状和盘状,EVS法高估了棒状骨料的粒径;粒径计算方法对细观混凝土内部结构的影响因骨料形状类型不同而呈现一定差异性.

    Abstract:

    Aggregate particle size was measured by the minimum bounding box (MBB) method and compared with that calculated by the equal volume sphere (EVS) method. The results of these two methods on the internal structure of meso-concrete were analyzed. The results show that the aggregate particle size calculated by MBB method is close to that measured by sieving method in the laboratory test. Compared with the MBB method, the EVS method tends to underestimate the particle sizes of spherical, blade and disc types of aggregates, and the percentage of underestimated aggregates is in descending order as spherical, blade and disc types while that of the particles of rode type was overestimated. The influence of the particle size calculation method on the internal structure of meso- concrete shows some differences with respect to the type of aggregate shape.

    表 1 Zingg 双变量法分类Table 1 Zingg’s bivariate classification
    图1 三维骨料模型生成流程Fig.1 3D aggregate model generation process
    图2 采用EVS法和MBB法计算骨料粒径的示意图Fig.2 Schematic diagram of using EVS method and MBB method to calculate aggregate particle size
    图3 4种形状类型骨料形态及其分布Fig.3 Morphology and distribution of four shape types of aggregates
    图4 2种粒径的散点图Fig.4 Scatter plots of two kinds of particle sizes
    图5 4种形状类型骨料的λ的概率密度分布Fig.5 Probability density distribution of λ of four shape types of aggregates
    图6 4种形状类型骨料的2种粒径预测曲线与实测值对比Fig.6 Comparison between predicted curve results and measured values of four shape types of aggregates
    图7 4种形状类型骨料的2种粒径累积分布曲线对比Fig.7 Comparison of cumulative distribution curves of two particle sizes of four shape types of aggregates
    图8 4种形状类型单位骨料的体积和表面积Fig.8 Volume and surface area of four shape types of unit aggregate
    图9 基于2种粒径计算方法生成的细观混凝土模型中的骨料数量Fig.9 Aggregate number in meso-concrete model generated based on two particle size calculation methods
    图10 细观混凝土模型中骨料体积累计分布(骨料体积分数为40%)Fig.10 Cumulative distribution of aggregate volume in meso-concrete model(aggregate volume fraction is 40%)
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

朱天宇,陈忠辉,张令非,年庚乾.粒径计算方法对细观混凝土数值建模的影响[J].建筑材料学报,2024,27(2):106-113

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-13
  • 最后修改日期:2023-06-01
  • 在线发布日期: 2024-02-29
文章二维码