基于电磁混合理论的沥青路面密度预估方法
作者:
作者单位:

1.哈尔滨工业大学 交通科学与工程学院,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150090;2.哈尔滨工业大学 城市水资源与水环境国家重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150090;3.深圳大学 广东省城市空间信息工程重点实验室,广东 深圳 518060

作者简介:

熊学堂(1991—),男,湖北鄂州人,哈尔滨工业大学博士生. E-mail: xuetangxiong@163.com

通讯作者:

谭忆秋(1968—),女,吉林德惠人,哈尔滨工业大学教授,博士生导师,博士. E-mail: yiqiutan@163.com

中图分类号:

U416.217

基金项目:

广东省城市空间信息工程重点实验室开放基金资助项目(SZU51029202005);国家自然科学基金资助项目(U20A20315)


Density Prediction Method of Asphalt Pavement Based on Electromagnetic Mixing Theory
Author:
Affiliation:

1.School of Science and Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China;2.State Key Laboratory of Urban Water Resource and Environment, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China;3.Guangdong Key Laboratory for Urban Informatics, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了实现沥青路面密度的准确预估,开展了沥青混合料的介电特性测试和密度预估模型对比研究.基于多相复合材料的电磁混合理论,推导出沥青混合料的4种密度预估模型(CRIM模型、Rayleigh模型、Böttcher模型和ALL模型);使用Percometer介电常数仪测定了沥青混合料旋转压实试件及其组分的相对介电常数,综合考虑了沥青混合料矿料级配类型和空隙率因素,进行了不同模型预估密度值与表干法实测密度值的误差分析;最后通过现场AC-20沥青路面探地雷达检测以及取芯检测验证了优选模型的准确性.结果表明:Percometer介电常数仪测得的沥青路面相对介电常数与探地雷达检测结果具有较好的一致性,沥青混合料密度预估模型的精度受到级配类型和空隙率的影响;与CRIM模型和Böttcher模型相比,Rayleigh模型和ALL模型更适用于沥青混合料密度预估,其中ALL模型预估精度最高.

    Abstract:

    To realize the accurate estimation of the asphalt pavement density, the dielectric property test and density prediction model comparison of the asphalt mixture were carried out. Four density prediction models (CRIM model, Rayleigh model, Böttcher model and ALL model) of the asphalt mixture were derived from the electromagnetic mixing theory of the multiphase composite materials. The relative permittivity values of the asphalt mixture specimens prepared by superpave gyratory compactor and its components were measured by Percometer dielectric constant detector. Considering the gradation type and void ratio of the asphalt mixture, the errors between the density values estimated by different models and measured by surface dry method were thoroughly analysed. Finally, the density prediction accuracies of the optimal models were verified by the Ground Penetrating Radar detection and core data of the on-site AC-20 asphalt pavement. The results demonstrate that the consistency of asphalt pavement relative permittivity measurement between Percometer and Ground Penetrating Radar can be obtained. The accuracy of asphalt mixture density prediction model is affected by gradation type and void ratio. Rayleigh model and ALL model are more suitable for the density prediction of asphalt mixture than CRIM model and Böttcher model. ALL model has the highest precision.

    图1 各沥青混合料实测密度和预估密度Fig.1 Measured density and predicted density of different asphalt mixtures
    图2 沥青混合料密度预估模型的平均相对误差Fig.2 Average relative errors of asphalt mixture density prediction models
    图3 不同类型沥青混合料预估密度相对误差与空隙率的关系Fig.3 Relationship between predicted density relative errors and void ratios of different asphalt mixtures
    图4 沥青下面层横断面GPR图Fig.4 GPR image of asphalt lower layer cross section
    图5 Percometer与GPR所得相对介电常数的关系Fig.5 Relationship between relative permittivity derived from Percometer and GPR
    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

熊学堂,谭忆秋,张德津,肖神清,王伟.基于电磁混合理论的沥青路面密度预估方法[J].建筑材料学报,2022,25(6):650-656

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-03-15
  • 最后修改日期:2021-07-05
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-01
文章二维码