SBS改性沥青高温性能评价指标的比较
作者:
基金项目:

国家自然科学基金资助项目(51478351)


Comparison of Evaluation Parameters for High Temperature Performance of SBS Modified Asphalt
Author:
  • 摘要
  • | |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献 [12]
  • |
  • 相似文献 [20]
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • | |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    选取多掺量线型、星型SBS改性沥青进行DSR动态剪切时间扫描试验和多应力蠕变回复(MSCR)试验,比较了用于评价沥青高温性能的几种指标:车辙因子G*/sin δ,Shenoy不可恢复柔量1-1/(tan δ·sin δ) G*以及在0.1,3.2kPa应力水平下10个周期内不可恢复蠕变柔量之平均值Jnr0.1,Jnr3.2的异同点,并对根据车辙试验得到的改性沥青混合料动稳定度与各评价指标之间的相关性进行回归分析.结果表明:当SBS掺量较低时,变化改性剂掺量对改性沥青高温性能的影响更为显著;随着SBS掺量的提高,线型、星型SBS改性沥青高温性能的差异缩小;1-1/(tan δ·sin δ) G*,Jnr0.1在高温性能评价上均优于车辙因子,而Jnr3.2与改性沥青混合料动稳定度的相关性最差.

    Abstract:

    Linear and radial SBS modified asphalt with varying polymer contents were selected to perform DSR dynamic shear time sweep test and multiple stress creep recovery(MSCR) test with the purpose of comparing these parameters in characterizing high temperature performance. Meanwhile, regression analysis were carried out between dynamic stability from wheel tracking test and these parameters. 1-1/(tan δ·sin δ) G*, Jnr results indicate that the effect of increasing SBS content is more prominent for binders at lower SBS content. Besides, Jnr results indicate that the performance gap between linear and radial SBS modified binders reduces with the increase of SBS content. The regression analysis between dynamic stability of modified asphalt mixture and these parameters indicate that 1-1/(tan δ·sin δ) G* and Jnr0.1 are better than G*/sin δ with respect to high temperature performance characterization, while Jnr3.2 owns the least relativity.

    参考文献
    [1]杜月宗,宋晓燕.对SBS改性沥青评价指标的讨论[C]∥全国第九次石油沥青技术交流会论文集.昆明:中国石化沥青情报站,2004:55 57.
    DU Yuezong,SONG Xiaoyan.Discussion on SBS modified asphalt evaluation method[C]∥9th National Technique Symposium on Petroleum Asphalt.Kunming:Sinopec Asphalt Information Station,2004:55 57.(in Chinese)
    [2]邹桂莲,张肖宁,李智.SHRP沥青高温分级存在的几点问题[J].石油沥青,2003,17(S1):116 118,123.
    ZOU Guilian,ZHANG Xiaoning,LI Zhi.Problems in SHRP high temperature grading system[J].Petroleum Asphalt,2003,17(S1):116 118,123.(in Chinese)
    [3]STUART K D,MOGAWER W S,ROMERO P.Validation of asphalt binder and mixture tests that measure rutting susceptibility using the accelerated loading facility[R].McLean,VA:Turner Fairbank Highway Research Center,2000.
    [4]DANGELO J A,DONGRE R.Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders[C]∥Proceedings of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association. Saskatoon:[s.n.],2002:91 103.
    [5]BAHIA H U,HANSON D I,ZENG M,et al.NCHRP report 459:Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design[R].Washington,D.C.:Transportation Research Board,2001.
    [6]SHENOY A.Nonrecovered compliance from dynamic oscillatory test vis  vis nonrecovered compliance from multiple stress creep recovery test in the dynamic shear rheometer[J].International Journal of Pavement Engineering,2008,9(5):329 341.
    [7]DANGELO J A,KLUTTZ R,DONGRE R,et al.Revision of the superpave high temperature binder specification:The multiple stress creep recovery test[J].Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists,2007,76:123 162.
    [8]DANGELO J A.The relationship of the MSCR test to rutting[J].Road Materials and Pavement Design,2009,10(S1):61 80.
    [9]AASHTO.MP 19 10 standard specification for performance graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery(MSCR) test[S].Washington,D.C.:American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials,2010.
    [10]ASTM D7405 10a.Standard test method for multiple stress creep and recovery(MSCR) of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer[S].West Conshohocken,PA:American Society for Testing and Materials,2010.
    网友评论
    网友评论
    分享到微博
    发 布
引用本文

黄卫东,郑茂,唐乃膨,鄯增平. SBS改性沥青高温性能评价指标的比较[J].建筑材料学报,2017,20(1):139-144

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:787
  • 下载次数: 0
  • HTML阅读次数: 0
  • 引用次数: 0
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-05-29
  • 最后修改日期:2015-07-18
  • 在线发布日期: 2017-03-07
文章二维码