相变储能石膏板导热系数2种测试方法的研究
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

“十二五”国家科技支撑计划项目(2011BAE14B06 07);厦门市科技计划项目(3502Z200)


Experimental Investigation of Thermal Conductivity of Phase Change Energy Storage Plasterboard in Two Test Methods
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    相变储能石膏板导热系数的测试多采用单一的非稳态测试方法,为更好表征相变储能石膏板导热系数的变化规律,分别采用稳态测试方法(防护热板法)和非稳态测试方法研究了相同配合比相变储能石膏板的导热系数.分析比较发现:随着相变材料掺量的增大,石膏基相变储能构件的导热系数降低;2种测试方法均能反映相变储能石膏板导热系数的变化规律,初始温度在相变温度区间时,试件的导热系数值最大;非稳态测试得到的导热系数值较大.

    Abstract:

    Though the thermal conductivity of phase change energy storage plasterboard was usually tested by unsteady method, a stable method was proposed to investigate the change of thermal conductivity of phase change energy storage plasterboard. Two testing methods, steady state test method of protection hot plate method and unsteady test method, were compared in the measurement of the thermal conductivity of the phase change energy storage plasterboard with the same proportions. By the analysis and comparison of the two kinds of test methods, the thermal conductivity will decrease with the addition content of phase change materials increasing; both methods can reflect the changes of the thermal conductivity, and the thermal conductivity will be highest if the initial plasterboard temperature is within the phase change temperature interval; the result of thermal conductivity measured by unsteady test method is larger than that of steady test method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

李悦,鲍振洲,秦宪明,谢静超.相变储能石膏板导热系数2种测试方法的研究[J].建筑材料学报,2014,17(4):613-617

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2013-02-19
  • 最后修改日期:2013-04-02
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2014-08-28
  • 出版日期: